- 无标题文档
查看论文信息

论文题名(中文):

 延边地区传统村落景观评价和可持续发展策略研究    

作者:

 张冉冉    

学号:

 2021010770    

保密级别:

 公开    

论文语种:

 chi    

学科代码:

 070502    

学科名称:

 理学 - 地理学 - 人文地理学    

学生类型:

 硕士    

学位:

 理学硕士    

学校:

 延边大学    

院系:

 地理与海洋科学学院    

专业:

 地理学    

第一导师姓名:

 崔珊珊    

第一导师学校:

 延边大学    

论文完成日期:

 2024-07-22    

论文答辩日期:

 2024-07-30    

论文题名(外文):

 Research on Landscape Evaluation and Sustainable Development Strategies of Traditional Villages in Yanbian Area    

关键词(中文):

 延边地区 传统村落景观 可持续发展 景观评价    

关键词(外文):

  Yanbian area traditional village landscape sustainable development landscape evaluation    

论文文摘(中文):

传统村落拥有丰富的地域文化要素,是增强民族自信,传承中华民族优秀文化
的重要角色。特别是以少数民族文化为主导文化的延边地区传统村落,是多年来多民族共同生活,逐渐融合而成的代表,是增强民族互相了解、促进民族团结,形成文化共识的重要媒介。近年来,城镇化的快速发展,导致延边地区传统村落生存受到威胁,为传统村落在现代化发展进程中能继续发挥其文化、历史等价值,开展延边地区传统村落景观可持续发展研究。 
本文以延边地区传统村落景观为研究对象,首先,通过资料收集与实地调研,
梳理延边地区传统村落景观的地理环境,并初步判断现阶段延边地区传统村落景观可持续发展遇到的问题。其次,通过对相关专家咨询,结合收集到的资料,制定延边地区传统村落景观评价问卷,运用层次分析-(AHP)模糊综合评价法对问卷数据进行处理,得出延边地区传统村落景观评价数据结果。最后,结合问卷结果、实地调研与访谈获得的信息,从自然景观、物质文化景观、非物质文化景观、景观社会环境四个方面探索延边地区传统村落景观可持续发展策略。主要研究结果如下: 
第一,通过资料分析发现,延边地区传统村落形成背景具有很大相似性,传统
村落景观带有强烈的少数民族色彩,且以朝鲜族要素居多。在社会历史影响下,人口的变化与迁徙造成延边地区传统村落规模、选址、经济发展、景观存留状况均有差异。因此,依据传统村落选址、规模、发展状况、景观存留现状各不相同的水南村、北兴村、新屯村进行实地考察,进行延边地区传统村落景观评价问卷填写调研,获得更加科学、准确的传统村落调研结果。 
第二,结合传统村落评价相关标准、体系,进行延边地区传统村落景观评价,
并通过层次分析(AHP)-模糊综合评价分析问卷数据得出 6 个准则层权重值:自然景观0.1691、村落建筑景观0.2169、公共设施0.0960、农业生产景观0.0105、非物质文化景观0.2711、景观社会环境0.0142,结合实地考察后发现延边地区传统村落自然景观具有极其独特的地域性,生态环境优异,是发展生态旅游优选之地;文化景观发展状况虽不甚乐观,但发展潜力巨大;景观的社会环境的适配性需要增强协调力度。 
第三,通过对水南村、北兴村、新屯村的综合评价数据进行分析与实地调研发
现:村落居民对景观发展持有积极乐观态度,各方力量团结协作,帮助村落积极吸引企业投资,运用村落自然条件,发展特色乡村旅游、地域性农业、手工业、民族技艺等,促进村落经济发展,持续为村落景观可持续发展提供源源不断经济支持。 
通过对延边地区传统村落的综合分析,判断延边地区传统村落发展困境与有利
条件,为延边地区传统村落景观寻找有实际操作性、因地制宜的可持续发展策略,为延边地区传统村落景观发展提供有利条件,传扬延边地区优秀传统文化,增强民族自信,为千万乡村的可持续发展提供思路。

文摘(外文):

Traditional villages have rich regional cultural elements and play an important role in enhancing national self-confidence and inheriting the excellent culture of the Chinese nation. In particular, the traditional villages in Yanbian area with minority culture as the 
dominant culture are the representatives of multi-ethnic living together and gradually integrating over the years, and are an important medium for enhancing mutual understanding, promoting national unity and forming cultural consensus. In recent years, the rapid development of urbanization has threatened the survival of traditional villages in 
Yanbian area. In order to continue to give full play to the cultural and historical values of traditional villages in the process of modernization, research on the sustainable development of traditional village landscape in Yanbian area has been carried out. 
This paper takes the traditional village landscape in Yanbian area as the research object. 
First, through data collection and field investigation, the geographical environment of the traditional village landscape in Yanbian area is sorted out, and the problems encountered in the sustainable development of the traditional village landscape in Yanbian area are 
preliminically judged. Secondly, through consulting relevant experts and combining the collected data, the questionnaire of landscape evaluation of traditional villages in Yanbian area was developed. The hierarchical analysis - (AHP) fuzzy comprehensive evaluation 
method was used to process the questionnaire data, and the result of landscape evaluation data of traditional villages in Yanbian area was obtained. Finally, the sustainable development strategy of traditional village landscape in Yanbian area is explored from four 
aspects: natural landscape, material cultural landscape, intangible cultural landscape and landscape social environment, combined with the questionnaire results, field investigation and interview information. The main findings are as follows: 
Second, combined with the relevant standards and systems of traditional village evaluation, the traditional village landscape evaluation in Yanbian area was carried out, and six criterion layer weight values were obtained through AHP - fuzzy comprehensive 
evaluation to analyze the questionnaire data: Natural landscape 0.1691, village architectural landscape 0.2169, public facilities 0.0960, agricultural production landscape 0.0105, intangible cultural landscape 0.2711, landscape social environment 0.0142. After field investigation, it is found that: The natural landscape of traditional villages in Yanbian 
area has a very unique region and excellent ecological environment, which is the best choice for developing ecological tourism. Although the development situation of cultural landscape is not very optimistic, the development potential is huge; The adaptation of 
landscape social environment needs to enhance coordination. 
Thirdly, through the analysis and field investigation of the comprehensive evaluation data of Shuinan Village, Beixing Village and Xintun Village, it is found that: Village residents hold a positive and optimistic attitude towards landscape development, and all 
forces work together to help the village actively attract investment from enterprises, make use of the natural conditions of the village, develop characteristic rural tourism, regional agriculture, handicrafts, ethnic skills, etc., promote the economic development of the 
village, and continue to provide continuous economic support for the sustainable development of the village landscape. 
Through comprehensive analysis of traditional villages in Yanbian area, the development difficulties and favorable conditions of traditional villages in Yanbian area are judged, and sustainable development strategies with practical operation and local 
conditions are sought for the traditional village landscape in Yanbian area, so as to provide favorable conditions for the development of traditional village landscape in Yanbian area, 
spread the excellent traditional culture in Yanbian area, and enhance national selfconfidence. To provide ideas for the sustainable development of tens of millions of villages.

参考文献:
[1] 本刊.牢牢把握新时代“三农”工作总抓手——2018年中央1号文件解读摘选[J].中国农民合作社,2018(03):25.26.
[2] SAUER C O. Recent developments in cultural geography[C]// Hayes E C. Recent Development in the Social Sciences.New York: Lippin cott,1927.
[3] 李和平,肖竞.我国文化景观的类型及其构成要素分析[J].中国园林,2009,25(2):90-94
[4] 傅伯杰.景观生态学原理及应用.第2版[M].科学出版社, 2011.
[5] 马淑燕.可持续发展理论内涵的思考[J].宁夏大学学报(自然科学版),1999,(02):33.35.
[6] 牛文元.中国可持续发展的理论与实践[J].中国科学院院刊,2012,27(03):280.289.
[7] 郭晓冬.黄土丘陵区乡村聚落发展及其空间结构研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2007:19.27
[8] Sauer C O. The morphology of landscape, Berkeley [M]. University of California publication in geography,1925.
[9] Sauer, Carl Ortwin. The Morphology of Landscape[M]. California: University of California Press,1925:337.343.
[10] 王开璇.《威尼斯宪章》以来真实性概念的变化及实践效用研究[J].阜阳师范大学学报(社会科学版),2020(05):125.129.
[11] 吴朔桦.世界文化遗产的国际法保护[D].中国政法大学,2017.
[12] Amos Rapoport. House From and Culture [M]. Mirror Images Production,1985
[13] 袁忠.龙庆忠古建研究的思想脉络及在中国建筑史学上的典型意义[J].南方建筑,2009,No.130(02):65.67.
[14] 刘敦桢著.河北省西部古建筑调查纪略[M].中国营造学社,1935.
[15] 梁思成等.未完成的测绘图[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2007
[16] 刘敦桢.中国住宅概说[M].北京:建筑工程出版社,1957.
[17] 陈志华文;李玉祥摄影.楠溪江中游古村落[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1999.10.
[18] 中国建筑技术发展中心历史研究所.浙江民居[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1984.
[19] 祁新华,程煜,陈烈等.国外人居环境研究回顾与展望[J].世界地理研究,2007,16(2):17.24.
[20] 赵世瑜、周尚意,中国文化地理概说,太原:山西教育出版社1991年:103.105.
[21] 阮仪三.水乡古镇葆真趣——历史古镇昆山周庄的规划[J].建筑师,1989(32):30.43.
[22] 阮仪三,邵甬.精益求精返璞归真——周庄古镇保护规划[J].城市规划,1999(07):53.56.
[23] 刘源,李晓峰.旅游开发与传统聚落保护的现状与思考[J].新建筑2003(02):29.31.
[24] 于晓琪.古村落保护的立法借鉴与紧迫性分析[J].中国文物科学研究,2006,1:35.39.
[25] 冯骥才.传统村落的困境与出路:兼谈传统村落是另一类文化遗产.民间文化论坛,2013,(1):7.12.
[26] 顾大治,王彬,黄雨萌,许晓迪.基于非物质文化遗产活化的传统村落保护与更新研究——以安徽绩溪县湖村为例[J].西部人居环境学刊,2018,33(02):100.105.
[27] Curovic Zeljka. Identification and Evaluation of Landscape as a Precondition for Planning Revitalization and Development of Mediterranean Rural Settlements.Case Study: Mrkovi Village,Bay of Kotor,Montenegro[J].SUSTAINABILITY,2019,11(7):25.40.
[28] 徐梦颖.乡村景观营建中地域文化的应用研究—以富盛马拉松精品线沿线村庄景观设计为例[D].杭州:浙江农林大学,2018.
[29] Countryside Agency. 2002. Landscape Character Assessment Guidance for England and Scotland.
[30] Daniel TC, Boster RS. Measuring and scape esthetics: The scenic beauty estimation method [M]. Colorado: USDA, 1976.
[31] Buhyoff G J, Wellman JD, Daniel TC. Predicting scenic beauty for mountain Pine beetle and western spruce budworm damaged forest vistas [J]. Forest Science, 1982,28(4):827.838.
[32] Litton Jr., Burton R. Descriptive approaches to landscape analysis [R]. Berkeley, California. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, 1979.
[33] 樊丽,乡村景观规划与田园综合体设计研究[M],北京:中国水利水电出版社,2019.03,35.40.
[34] Schlaepfer R. Ecosystem.based management of natural resources: a step towards sustainable development[C]. IUFRO Occasional Paper No.6. Vienna, Austria: International Union of Forerst Research Organizations,1997.
[35] Bishop I D, Hulse D W. Predicting scenic beauty using mapped data and geographic information systems [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1994, 30(1): 59.70.
[36] P. J. Jones, E. Andersen , C. Capitani et al. The EU societal awareness of landscape indicator: A review of its meaning, utility and performance across different scales[J]. Land Use Policy.2016.
[37] 彭一刚.传统村镇聚落景观分析[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1994.3.
[38] 刘艺兰.少数民族村落文化景观遗产保护研究[D].北京:中央民族大学,2011,8.15.
[39] 刘沛林.家园的景观与基因:传统聚落景观基因图谱的深层解读[M].北京:商务印书馆,2014.1.
[40] 李伯华,刘沛林,窦银娣,曾灿,陈驰.中国传统村落人居环境转型发展及其研究进展[J].地理研究,2017,36(10):1886.1900.
[41] 刘春腊,徐美,刘沛林,曾凡超.传统村落文化景观保护性补偿模型及湘西实证[J].地理学报,2020,75(02):382.397.
[42] 王晞颖.文化景观视角下湘西尽远村传统村落保护与发展研究[D].长沙:湖南大
学,2019.
[43] 张艳玲.历史文化村镇评价体系研究[D].华南理工大学,2011.
[44] 赵勇,张捷,卢松等.历史文化村镇评价指标体系的再研究——以第二批中国历史文化名镇(名村)为例[J].建筑学报,2008,(03):64.69.
[45] 梁雪春,达庆利,朱光亚.我国城乡历史地段综合价值的模糊综合评判[J].东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2002(02):44.46.
[46] 柳雨彤.天津市历史文化名镇村保护项目评价体系研究[J].城市,2013(09):39.42.
[47] 李霄鹤,兰思仁.基于K.modes的福建传统村落景观类型及其保护策略[J].中国农业资源与区划,2016,37(08):142.149.
[48] 张琳.旅游视角下的乡村景观特征及规划思考——以云南元阳阿者科村为例[J].风景园林,2017(05):87.93.
[49] 陈晨.基于游憩者满意度调查的苏南传统村落景观更新研究[D].南京林业大学,2020.
[50] 朱祎珍.福建忠山村传统村落景观资源评价与保护[J].西南林业大学学报(社会科学),2020,4(06):45.51.
[51] 김봉렬. 중국 (中國) 연변지구 (延邊地區) 조선족 (朝鮮族) 의 마을과 주거[J]. 건축역사연구: 한국건축역사학회논문집, 1994, 3(1): 57.82
[52] 김준봉.중국 장백산 조선족 마을의 주거 형식에 관한 조사연구[ J ].韓國農村建築學會論文集,2000,02(01):47.55.
[53] 강용.중국 연변지역 조선족마율과 한족마음의 문화경관 비교인 구.창차이촌과 무이동을 대상으로[ D ].서울대학교 2014.
[54] 崔敏浩.중국 사회변동이 조성족 주거준화에 미치는 영향 연구.연변지역 조선족 전통 가목을 중심으로[ J ] 역사민속학,2017,6( 52):285.312.
[55] 孙春日。试论延边朝鲜族聚居区的形成[J].民族研究,1990(01):84.93
[56] 金仁鹤,张泰贤.关于延边朝解族村落的空间结构变化研究[J].中国园林,2004(01):66.69.
[57] 崔文一,李佰寿,朝鲜族集聚地建筑文化的探讨——以吉省龙井市区为例[J].延边大学学报(自然科学版)2006(04):280.284.
[58] 闫超.延边朝鲜族传统民居特征及发展趋势研究[D].延边大学,2011.
[59] 金日学,张瑞桐,屈潇楠.咸境道型朝鲜族民居的特点及空间行为演变[J].建筑与文化,2018(10):237.238.
[60] 张芮.景观基因视角下的延边地区朝鲜族传统村落文化景观研究[D].延边大学,2019.
[61] 韦宝畏,穆佳宁,许文芳.朝鲜族传统村落文化空间重构探析——以龙井市明东村为例[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版),2020(05):14.22.
[62] 韦宝畏,陈旭辉,裴宏博.风水学视阈下的朝鲜族传统村落保护——以龙井市长财村为例[J].中国文化遗产,2021(04):66.73.
[63] 程志强. 东三省传统村落与非物质文化遗产空间分布及关系研究——以延边朝鲜族自治州为例[D].延边大学,2023.
[64] 延边朝鲜族自治州地方志编纂委员会.延边朝鲜族自治州志[M].北京:中华书局,2016.12:102.104.
[65] 汤茂林.文化景观的内涵及其研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2000,(01):70.79.
[66] 郭林娜,吴文治,赵斌,等.中国传统村落文化景观的类型学研究[J].东华大学学报(社会科学版),2022,22(02):72.80.DOI:10.19883/j.1009.9034.2022.0082.
[67] 李秀峰.乡村旅游开发与精准扶贫策略研究[D].广西师范大学,2017:78
开放日期:

 2024-08-18    

无标题文档